While Good Copy Bad
Copy does provide differing perspectives on the issue of copyright laws, pulling interviews from both the
enforcers and the “criminals”, there is clearly no question as to which side
the creators are shining a positive light on. The negative repercussions of
‘copyrighted’ material have so intensively been ingrained in us that the
portrayal of large public acceptance of remixed material may seem a bit out of
the ordinary. Property rights, specifically intellectual property rights in
this context, have acted as the poster-child for American culture and the ‘American
Dream’. It is clear that such an idealistic concept, when put into practice, is
subject to the same corruption and hypocrisy intrinsic to the bases of this
dream.
One specific scene that addressed this was the interview
with the Brazilian in the brewery, in which he says that the continued restructuring
of the copyright laws are intended “to protect certain very specific interests…in
order to prevent society from becoming the producer of culture in itself and
for itself” (32:20). This idea is often overlooked when attempting to argue for
the virtues of the copyright laws. Here, the groups are not personified as the
struggling artist competing with the fraudulent pirate, but rather as the monopolizing
corporations of the United States with the power-deprived masses of society. Presented
in this way, remix-culture can be seen as an attempt to take-back their power
as a cultural society, similar to how graffiti artists attempt to gain control
of what their streets look like.
Another example of this that specifically portrayed the
dichotomy of the U.S. and the rest of the world was in the interview with the
Pirate Bay creators, “they think that U.S. jurisdiction stretches around the
world. It’s illegal according to U.S. law but not according to Swedish law…you
don’t decide over the internet, we the users do” (17:50). The international
perspectives presented in the film provided clear resentment and rejection of
any claims of the universality of the U.S. copyright laws. In addition, the
Pirate Bay creators argue for the legitimacy of the users’ power over internet
content, claiming that the interests of the people will be represented by
denying and fighting subjection to American copyright laws.
Finally, the final scene of the film in which Girl Talk, of whom the film started
with, is remixing the Brazilian DJ’s remix of an American popular song
represents the intangible range of creativity that the digital age has made
possible. File-sharing “goes back to the whole folk culture thing”, stretching
from the song’s U.S. origins, to Brazil’s culture of creating remixes to be played and used in essentially
organizing giant raves, and then back to Pittsburgh where Girl Talk reinterprets it (56:45). He says that each remix is a reinterpretation
of an original story, adding new elements of stories and culture. In this sense,
the traditional American idea of copyright protecting the incentive for creativity
is directly contradicted, and that our current digital climate of mass media provides
its own incentive. “Everyone’s been bombarded with media now that I think we’ve almost been
forced to use it as an art form” (2:30).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.