Thursday, April 16, 2015

Identification

The strength and weakness of identification is its ability to group. Identifying with people can be a great thing that fosters belonging and understanding. Identifying does not just happen though; it is a conscious choice, which means that while identification is taking place so is the reverse.
There is no way around the binary that takes place because it is based off of distinctions that we have made as a society. The differences never just stop at being differences either, the question of best and worst, good and bad, right and wrong are often attached to these divides. These feelings can create polarizing effects that are unnecessary. The rationale for being for something can be just as important as for being against. So even though on the surface identification and the idea of belonging is something that unites people it is at the same time dividing us based on our adoption of one way while almost rejecting another.
Identification is everywhere throughout our lives. There are five areas of identification that matter a lot depending on the person. Four of them play large roles in the fifth. Sex and gender, race, religion, orientation, and politics are all identities that are debated and discussed constantly. Conflicting identities cause a lot of strife day to day. Each area has different identities within them, and at face value these differences are not threatening. It is when we place them in dialogue that treats them as opponents that creates the difficulties.
By tying the fundamental differences between two, three, or more side to emotion it is easy to keep the identities stagnant and separate. This is often done through repletion. It is almost as if something is said enough times then it has to be true.  This is especially successful if the things being repeated are “scientific facts” (Gates 4) . If we other someone to the point of not even being the same thing as us it creates a feeling of superiority and power. This commonly happens with race. People have ideas and opens based on made up science from decades ago.  Dominance is only a matter of culture and societal norms. What makes everyone different has less to do with real differences and more to do with what we as a culture have decided make us different.  

Identification can be a tool to gain the upper hand because of it simultaneous functions. The identifying and othering that happen create the need for a reason why we are one thing and not another or the other. So maybe the only way to avoid othering or alienation is to avoid identifying. 

1 comment:

  1. Hi Kristin,

    Thanks for the post! I'm happy you chose to talk about identity and identification in your post, since that is the route I took as well. I think it is important to consider the context of identity and how that shapes our perspective of the world whenever we read something, or even have an experience. You noted that perhaps as a way to avoid classifying others on some certain identifying factor, we should simply stop identifying people in general since that only leads to alienation. I obviously agree with this point, and I wholeheartedly wish that were true. But as you are surely aware of, that is not the case. We find it so easy to generalize others and put them in a group because it allows us to avoid getting to know the person on an intimate level, thus we have no reason to feel for them. Take the homeless man on the street. We can easily identify him as deadbeat drug addict who has no ambition to get his life together. But in doing so, we completely negate all the other aspects that make him a human being. Perhaps he's an artist, or he used to be a math professor. Perhaps he's suffering from a mental illness that makes it difficult for him to get a job. The possibilities are endless.

    I took this same idea about identity and tied it our reading on Helen Keller. Being a woman and a disabled person during the time period she lived in most certainly placed her in two groups that were considered as "lesser" in society. Despite these setbacks, she became one of the most famous feminist figures in history. While we cannot disconnect her from her identity, we can allow her unique perspective to show how wrong we can be when judging others based on their classifications.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.