Many
people believe that in order for a person or group of people to receive proper representation,
they must tell their own story. Obviously it is hard for one group of people to
represent another group of people properly, so it is up to individuals to tell
the stories of their own people and of their selves. This is a notion I think a
lot of writers we have previously studied in this class would agree with, such
as Pauline Johnson, who argued for the proper representation of Native
Americans, and Michel Foucault who spoke a lot about power structures and how
minority groups require representation. After reading Judith Butler's Gender Trouble, I was left a little
confused about Butler's stance on this issue, but it seemed that she did not
agree that that was how representation works. It seems that she finds so many
other issues in conducting a female identity in literature and media that even
self representation would be flawed.
According
to Butler, "representation is the normative function of a language which
is said to either reveal or to distort what is assumed to be true about the
category of women," (Butler, 2). I gathered this to mean that
representation distorts the populace's view of the subject being represented.
Thus, if only thin, white women are depicted in media (which is true to a
certain extent), the popular conception of a woman would be a thin, white
women, which rejects women of other races and body sizes. This kind of flawed
representation can have a detrimental impact. For example, Johnson argued that
Native American women such as herself often feel neglected and out of place
because they never see women like them in media. On the off chance that they do
see a woman who looks like them, she is often presented inaccurately and is
only used as a plot device for a male lead. This leaves Native American women
feeling neglected and useless. They are not the only group with this
experience. The same can apply to all women of color as well as transgender
women, disabled women, etc. All women feel misrepresented and underrepresented,
but this lack of proper representation increases exponentially when more
minority factors are applied.
Butler
argues for the development of a language that fully and adequately represents
women since, as she pointed out, the English language (and most other languages
for that matter) is androcentric (Butler, 2). The need for such a language
system is important because women are often either misrepresented or not
represented at all to such an extreme extent that even our everyday language
focuses predominantly on men. In fact, even the phrase "woman" is
based on the word "man. Other words like HIStory and "MANkind"
prove that terms that are generalized to be about all people are designed to
put men front and center and to push women off to the side.
Where I
really started to think Butler doubted the possibility of proper female
representation was page eight when she said, "paradoxically, representation
will be shown to make sense for feminism only when the subject of 'women' is
nowhere presumed," (Butler, 8). I took this to mean that women cannot be a
subject since Butler previously stated that only those in positions of power
are able to create subjects and that representation comes from subjects,
(Butler, 3). She stressed that the conception of woman that people typically
have is a male-created conception since men are in a stance of power and men
are the ones creating subjects and this representation. Therefore, even if a
woman is representing women, she is still representing the male-created
conception of a woman that is not consistent with actual women, especially
since this conception drastically lacks intersectionality.
I agree
that there is a need for either a gender neutral or female dominated language,
but it seems that Butler doubts such a language can be brought to fruition even
though there are already communities working on that very subject. There has
been such a major push to change gendered phrases like "fire man" and
"mail man" to gender neutral ones like, "fire fighter" and
"mail carrier." Likewise, many
women have started using terms like "womyn" and "herstory"
to take the androcentrism out of common language. While these phrases have only
caught on in small communities, they are on the rise.
I tend to disagree with some of Butler's ideas of female representation. While I am in total agreement that intersectionality is extremely important in feminism and female representation, I disagree on her other ideas about the seeming impossibility of proper female representation. I think as long as women are representing themselves in contexts that are not filtered through a male lens, they should be able to create female subjects, identities, and representations that are successful. These opportunities rarely present themselves in patriarchal societies, but they are not unheard of.
Proper
female representation is rare. As we saw in Mr.
Burke, Meet Helen Keller by Ann Georg, Keller and Burke actually had
extremely similar rhetorical theories, yet only Burke is recognized for his
status as a rhetorician and Keller is instead remembered as the woman who
overcame blindness and deafness. Keller has always been considered a "strong
female rolemodel," but not in the way she should have been. Instead of
seeing her as a rolemodel for overcoming hardship, she should have been a
rolemodel for her ideas on feminism and rhetoric and for her work towards
bettering the world at large. It initially seems positive the way Keller is
remembered in history currently, but it is actually detrimental since she is
being remembered for only a fraction of what she has one and the bulk of her
work is ignored. However, there are rising feminist communities working to
solve the issue of improper female representation. Online artist communities
have created solid platforms for women to share art, poetry, literature, music
etc. about the female experience with a focus on intersectionality so that
women are not excluded regardless of their sexuality, race, ethnicity, or the
sex they are assigned at birth. Such communities have been growing on websites
like tumblr and etsy and they have managed to spread into pop culture,
promising a bright future for female representation on a large scale.
Word count: 1,048
Kayla,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate that you don’t pretend to know everything about the subject you chose to write about. These blogs are a great medium to systematically work through confusion and develop ideas about the dense material we read. Your post did an excellent job of allowing itself to develop into a concrete idea from a shaky foundation. The way you conceptualized representation in Butlers essay called for a development of language that wholly represents women. As the current language system stands there is an overarching emphasis on masculine hegemony. There is a strong association between normativity and power- the masculine normativity of language gives way to a society dominated by men because that is the nature of the language system.
Your side of the case forced me to place Butler’s theory under greater scrutiny rather than accepting it as law because there was no counter argument. I would like to pose a third point of view on this critical dilemma of agency. Is it perhaps not a question of personal representation that is so limited by language? Could it not instead be that images are constructed from language, a language that is wracked with diverging meaning and conflicting significance? Perhaps it is not representation that is impossible but interpretation.