In his essay Mitchell discusses the idea of "a picture about a picture." Seems a bit confusing at first, but he explains it further by explaining "that pictures might be capable of reflections on themselves.. of providing a second-order discourse" (38). Landow states that for one to truly understand a certain text we must look at everything that surrounds it. We have to understand the text that is about or references the previous text. When it comes to the image, however, it can be looked at just the same.
"As readers move through a web or network of texts, they continually shift the center... of their investigation and experience" (36). In Mitchell's essay he gives examples by using the image of "The Duck-Rabbit" and My Wife and my Mother-in-Law." Both of these images are left to interpretation of the viewer. Mitchell explains that a main part of meta-pictures is to know how to explain the image. When it comes down to the explanation however, it goes to his idea of self-reflexivity. Does the explanation of the image differ with everyones own interpretation of it?
I believe with Mitchell's explanation of self-reflexivity, the answer to that question is yes. No matter what the viewer sees when looking at either of those images, the reasoning for it purely comes from self-reflexivity. Which leads us back to decentering; "all hypertext systems permit the individual reader to choose his or her own center of investigation and experience" (38).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.