Landow argued that the lack of
linearity in hypertext does not make it more complex or difficult to
navigate through. His theories represent how hypertext is a different
animal. He describes how the functions are different and not
necessarily inferior or comparable on terms of difficulty. I found
this highly interesting so for this blog post I would like to analyze
how the nonlinear characteristics of hypertext affect the transform
the experience for the reader.
Hypertext is nonlinear due to its
structure. The inter-webbed texts create a network. I think one of
the most blatant characteristics of this is that it allows a reader
to choose how deep they would like to go into a text. In many ways it
makes the text read almost as a 'Choose your Own Adventure' book. The
audience can choose to go to the other sources to get a better
understanding on the content; or they can merely read the initial
text as an isolated piece. This is interesting because this
represents how some readers can force linearity in a system that
repels it. Hypertext strives to provide a network; to provide layers
to the text that bring it collaborative meaning.
The more active a reader is; the more
likely they are to dive deeper into the passages. Non-linear texts
come with certain expectations. When a reader comes in contact with a
nonlinear piece; they assume control. The reader feels in charge of
their academic experience. When readers come into linear texts they
expect everything they need to know to be presented to them. Readers
tend to be more passive when reading linear texts; while non-linear
texts encourage readers to be an active reader. The reader
understands that they play a crucial role in deconstructing the
information and drawing meaning. This is the biggest difference
between how hypertexts are received in comparison to traditional
methods.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.