Books, plays, poems, and literature
of all kinds commonly refer to what has come before it. These references can
sometimes be missed without prior knowledge by the reader. The intertextuality
in writing is made more apparent and present with the use of hypertext.
The concept of hypertext is
prevalently on the internet in an integral way. The internet without it would
be a very different place. Hypertext has the ability to make connections not
automatically apparent as well as link together corresponding ideas. These
connections create an environment that is focused on the reader supplying many
different avenues of exploration.
Hypertext
gives the reader an opportunity to focus on something in a larger scale than
before. Literature can now be accessed and analyzed in relation to other
things, opposed to being worked with on a more individual basis. This option
does not necessarily dictate that the reader has to think about the work in a
broader sense, but the ability is always there. Intertextuality…shifts
attention from the triad constituted by author/work/tradition to another constituted
by text/discourse/culture (Landow 35). Connections among texts break away from
the idea that texts exist discreetly. Linking also creates multiple contexts
and interpretations that create multivocality. “hypertext does not permit a tyrannical,
univocal voice. Rather the voice is always that distilled from the combined
experience of the momentary focus, the lexia one presently reads, and the continually
forming narrative of one’s reading path” (Landow 36).
Hypertext
also has the capacity to “decenter and recenter” the reader. Anyone that uses
the internet can relate to this idea. Wikipedia does this to me frequently.
After Googling something I need some quick information on and clicking on the Wikipedia
entry I have clicked onto three other entries and am now reading something that
has very little to do with my original inquiry. It serves as an interesting
rabbit hole for procrastination and trivia sometimes. Hypertext can derail a train of thought and
then a few sentences later start another one. This puts a lot of power and
responsibility on the reader to maintain focus. This also creates an
environment where the search is spurred by the reader individual pursuit, which
means that every reader can potentially come away from a topic with a different
understanding.
One of
the most interesting effects hypertext has on understanding is that it creates
numerous entry points within a subject. An article about bread making is going
to have a lot of pieces of information and facts. It may include a recipe, ingredients,
and maybe a brief history of bread making during a certain point in history. All
of the elements are possibly entry points for readers. The reason a reader
happens upon a story could make a difference to how they interpret the
story. Someone interested in the history
can have a very different reason or view from someone looking for a recipe or
someone with a gluten allergy.
Hi Kristin,
ReplyDeleteYour post brings up some interesting examples regarding hypertexts, particularly in their ability in either "decentering" or "recentering" the reader (especially since I've also found myself procrastinating in a similar fashion that you describe).
I do, however, find myself a little lost in your bread making example. Although I agree with you in regards to your definition of entry points and the potential examples within this larger example, I wonder if entry points are nearly as broad as they're implicated in this post. A broader term to use to accurately describe what consumers do when searching the Web is based on their participation in a network. According to Barthes, the general importance of non or antilinear thought appears in the frequency and centrality with which a network (or link, web, path, etc.) gives to it. (Landow, 44)
Landow focuses on four different meanings of network- one of which simply "refers to the entirety of all those terms for which there's no term and for which other terms stand until something better comes along, or until of them gathers fuller meanings and fuller acceptance to itself..." (43) Therefore, this term has magnified authority, whether they simply refer to electronic texts, multiple lexias, or the electronic system by which the Internet itself operates.
However, networks primarily refer to the nonlinear model people are accustomed to in their active hypertext use (as indicated in your mention of the several possibilities for entry points which are determined by different people and their corresponding motivation for entering that particular network of information). This is potentially useful in the assessment of current hypertext systems in place and plans for future ones; for example, weighing the needs of both the creators of content hoping to broaden appeal and reach a larger audience, and for consumers' need for increased accuracy/efficiency in the searches and search terms.
~Jasmine Spitler